[Apologies for my continued absence here at PFB. I hope to posting again again soon.... 2/24/12]
OK, just the initial PFB facts:
- Spanking should be reserved for those acts that involve a child's clear outward defiance of obedience. If you would, the size of the sin is measured more in terms of attitude and motivation behind the disobedience than just the breaking of a rule.
- Spanking should be regarded as a "teaching moment" for the good of your child. Thus the discipline applied should be characterized by strong conviction rather than strong emotion. I'm not saying that as parents we have to act as if we're emotionally detached from our child's disobedience. Rather, understanding that discipline is applied in order to impact and change a child's foolish beliefs and goals of self-centered living, a parent needs be under control in order to take time to explain the particular rule that was disobeyed and why the child's behavior violated that rule. Once the spanking is applied that is it. No recriminations are needed. And it is indeed appropriate and right to comfort your child afterwards. Don't apologize.
- Spanking is an event to be received by the child. It's not an impulsive act, i.e. not an emotional time to lose your cool. It's understandable and OK to be angry, but have your emotions under control. Take time to do that, if necessary, before administering the discipline.
- Remember, underneath that outward act of defiance is not just a rebel, as it were, but a scared individual, unsure of his or her place and value as a person. More is involved than simply raw defiance.
- Withdrawal of a privilege or opportunity for enjoyment. If a privilege (a recreation or toy) is abused then the consequence is to withdrawal it or another such privilege.
- Additional Responsibility. If the misbehavior is a failing to do a responsibility (a chore, homework, etc.) then add a responsibility as a logical consequence.